Search Results
7/17/2025, 8:40:53 PM
>>715732120
>but I'm pretty sure they WERE indeed intended to be used directly on people,
No they weren't. They were cumbersome and heavy and dangerous to their own users. Why use a flamethrower when an SMG and assault rifle would do the same job? If you look at any WW2 photos of flamethrower usage, they aim them towards bunkers.
>but I'm pretty sure they WERE indeed intended to be used directly on people,
No they weren't. They were cumbersome and heavy and dangerous to their own users. Why use a flamethrower when an SMG and assault rifle would do the same job? If you look at any WW2 photos of flamethrower usage, they aim them towards bunkers.
Page 1