Search Results
6/22/2025, 8:04:32 AM
>>11316615
>What exactly would being a Knight entail, do you imagine? Would it be the classic sense of being a warrior?
I'm leaning to Knighthood as a lower form of nobility. You get a lot of privedlges that poor folk lack (land, traveling past certain checkpoints, being allowed to hunt, being welcomed into higher class establishment). These make it ALOT easier to gain a comfortable living. But similar to how a classical warrior is beholden to obeying and supporting his lord, the male "nobles" of this setting are expected to uphold the chivalrous code in exchange for their privedlges As well as being lorded over by their Lady.
I feel like a Lady having multiple Knights shouldn't be wrong, I could see the true elites of Society being a board of women who each rule a handful of super successful knights and therefore make the matriarchy spanning decisions. But I also feel like Monogamy allows more women to backpack on men's hard work.
>What exactly would being a Knight entail, do you imagine? Would it be the classic sense of being a warrior?
I'm leaning to Knighthood as a lower form of nobility. You get a lot of privedlges that poor folk lack (land, traveling past certain checkpoints, being allowed to hunt, being welcomed into higher class establishment). These make it ALOT easier to gain a comfortable living. But similar to how a classical warrior is beholden to obeying and supporting his lord, the male "nobles" of this setting are expected to uphold the chivalrous code in exchange for their privedlges As well as being lorded over by their Lady.
I feel like a Lady having multiple Knights shouldn't be wrong, I could see the true elites of Society being a board of women who each rule a handful of super successful knights and therefore make the matriarchy spanning decisions. But I also feel like Monogamy allows more women to backpack on men's hard work.
Page 1