>>715699383
>Sorry that your reading comprehension is non existent.
Ironic considering you interpreted it as Nintendo and Pokemon being in the OP and not the thread in general, which is what he actually said.
>So what you can't make a normal Palworld thread without Nintendo somehow being mentioned or something?
You then proved him right by posting a thread where Nintendo and Pokemon were mentioned multiple times with at least one instance being to bump the thread during a dead period where it was most likely going to drop off.