>>17794117
>Many Southerners had to switch over from subsistence farming for themselves to cash crops to pay for the extortion.
Lazy faggots finally started having a surplus and you frame it as a complaint?
>Tacitly admits I'm right despite calling me a liar
I accept your concession, faggot.

>By "noted" you mean changed his tune for self-serving reasons.
Wrong.
>His only real concern was punishing the South for the crime of choosing to live under a different government.
No, it was destroying the capacity of the South to continue to engage in a pointless waste of human life when they were already beaten.
>But given that you don't believe in his moral code that the South was "common property" and the federal government was sovereign, it's hard to see what we have to debate here.
There's nothing to say because you're an emotional weakling with the heart of a woman who doesn't acknowledge the truth when he's staring at it, lest his carefully constructed fantasy reality come crashing down.
>robbery isn't violating the NAP?
Tariffs and taxes aren't theft. The South agreed to them and paid them. They had the power to change them. They chose not to.
>Quit joking around and make a point already.
I already did and you're too fucking stupid to understand it.
>You've put yourself in a position where you've admitted the war was entirely about looting
Incorrect
>so just defend it now.
I don't take orders from maggots and losers, especially regarding shit I didn't say
>If you don't know about Lincoln's fanatical adherence to the American system then you know nothing about the man and aren't qualified to talk with me.
Boo hoo hoo bitchtits. I've heard your bullshit line of rhetoric before. Yours contains inherent contradictions. Mine doesn't.