>>510838864
you have to get real close like for them, see? but, there are some low orbiting sats have taken photos showing the sites and the footprint trails. schizos say fake, however.

>>40573008
even if it was able to attain its maximum angular resolution while looking at the moon, something the size of the descent stage would maybe show up as half a pixel. And then you'd just call it fake anyway.

>>507993302
Oh yes we did