>>716360873
>>716359323
>>716358758
>>716287784
cont:

There's SOME models which put Proto-Nahuatl in Central mexico during the classic period, but they're uncommon and don't have a consensus for them yet, and to be honest I'm still confused about the specific proposals.

Even if the Teoithuacanos were some Nahua group, I don't think it would change that all the Nahua groups and states we think of as "Aztec'" came from a seperate, later migiration wave. The Mexica of Tenochtitlan absolutely did take artistic, architectural, and even urban design influence from Teotihuacan's ruins tho, revered the site, did excavations there, refurnished it's shrines, etc.

>>716346839
see
>>716288502 , I really don't think most people would care, for better or worse.

>>716345421
>>716345539
see
>>716288312, see arch.b4k link in >>716286648 for Mesoamerican games that aren't terrible

37/?