Search Results
7/26/2025, 5:00:46 PM
lmao it's real
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/06/26/ofcom-is-no-match-for-the-trolls-of-4chan/
>Ofcom has also demanded to see 4chan’s ‘risk-assessment records’. The UK regulator can fine platforms like 4chan £18 million, or 10 per cent of their turnover, if they refuse ‘compliance with the rules’.
>As such, it’s a racing certainty that 4chan will say, quite correctly, that what it puts on its US servers is none of Ofcom’s business, and that the British censors can go knit.
>Why is Ofcom repeatedly wasting its time and taxpayers’ money on telling foreign companies what they can publish on their websites? After all, this posturing isn’t merely futile. It is also damaging the reputation of the UK.
KEEEK
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/06/26/ofcom-is-no-match-for-the-trolls-of-4chan/
>Ofcom has also demanded to see 4chan’s ‘risk-assessment records’. The UK regulator can fine platforms like 4chan £18 million, or 10 per cent of their turnover, if they refuse ‘compliance with the rules’.
>As such, it’s a racing certainty that 4chan will say, quite correctly, that what it puts on its US servers is none of Ofcom’s business, and that the British censors can go knit.
>Why is Ofcom repeatedly wasting its time and taxpayers’ money on telling foreign companies what they can publish on their websites? After all, this posturing isn’t merely futile. It is also damaging the reputation of the UK.
KEEEK
Page 1