>>81597538
I wonder if the author of that article ever responded to its criticisms, like the whole orbiter ego boost thing, the mixed signals thing, the most guys strike out most of the time thing not to mention stuff like MeToo where either through clout chasing or by laziness a woman will make a spurious sexual assault claim just to get rid of a guy instead of saying no. Then theres hoeflation and careerhoeflation

>>81560731
Isnt that the joke? Most anons here are either decent looking already or simply in need of a haircut, and employed or in uni? Theres little to improve, what little there is can be chalked up to talking to more people. And that blaming the guys here and telling them to improove is just another kind of victim blaming when the problem is the women wont improve themselves while holding higher and higher standards and expectations while offering no loyalty or improvements to the guys life themselves.