>THERE ARE FEW AVOWED LEIBNIZIANS, LOCKEANS OR HOBBISTS TODAY. Self-styled Spinozists and Cartesians are also rare. But there seem to be plenty of Humeans.
Anthony Gottlieb, "dd", Cap. 7, "A Treatise of Animal Nature",side 244.

I starts to like the writer.

The authors seems to stress the qualities of Hume a lot. Indeed, he was a early predeceensor of what he called today "naturalists". I still hold the opinion that Hume himself should be rather seen in the light of a sceptical tradition.

I remember read in my younger years a writer who encourage with a silend sceptical tradition, perhaps it has been Nadler or Ungar or some other.
I believe Hume has been introduce to skeptical thinking by his lectures and has entertain discussions on the subjects during his time in France.