>>149237308
>Then what's the point of still coming here?
>what do you hope to gain from this?
To see if there's someone who's not the thread regulars, who constantly belittle me and expect me to take accountability for my actions when they don't actually do the same, to actually discuss things with, or a like-minded individual. Someone to discuss possible future developments in the show. How many times do you want me to answer the same question?
The funny thing is that someone else actually replied to one of my posts in this thread, and you accused me of samefagging.
>Cause the qualities you seek in these threads are largely non-existent
Which qualities? Actually discussing the show without resorting to bad-faith arguments, fallacies, and shitting on the writers (mostly on Viv)? Because that's what I would like. But I'm glad you concede that those qualities are absent from these threads.
>and from what I've observed (and directly experienced) you tend to go ballistic when the topic veers off into places you don't like. Thread schizos all do that, it seems -- policing discussion.
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but this and a lot of your posts come off as projection. You and other anons are the ones who accuse me of derailing your threads even when I'm not actually shitting on you or spamming threads. Trust me when I say that my melties months ago weren't unprovoked.

>>149237367
That's what /pol/ thinks pilpul is.