2 months later I still did not pick a new monitor in place of my VG248QE.

It appears I'm too sensible to motion clarity since I'm performance focused (used to do light competitive gaming), and I would need to try one of these 700$+ OLED monitor to make a fair comparison.

I have a question. It's mandatory for the number of FPS to match the target refresh rate for the motion clarity to express, right ?
Let's say I buy one of these Zowie TN monitor at 500Hz, I'd need 500 FPS to have the better motion clarity available on the market, right ?

For example when I watch RTINGS pictures for CAD @ Max Refresh Rate, the image is barely clearer from a PG27UCDM (QD-OLED 240Hz) to the VG248QE (TN 144Hz).

It feels I need to wait maybe 12 or 18 months to get an OLED screen that will truly match the capability of a TN panel in terms of motion clarity at an equivalent refresh rate.
If I buy an OLED right now, my theory is I'll get great relaxed gaming and media creation, but I'll get fucked even for light competitive gaming, not talking about burn-in 10 years from now, when my old TN only have a subtle line from the Windows' windows top and bottom bar (and I can't even find them right now). But in no way in the next year I see myself having more than 144 raster FPS in the games at 1080p or 1440p anyway (got an overclocked RX 9070).

Feels like I need a new kind of OLED that's 240Hz or under, 1440p, and black magic that makes motion clarity truly a step up.