>>40791437
Take on the roles of Integra and Fluxia, personifications of calculus integration and differentiation not just as mathematical operations, but metaphysical, perceptual, and conscious principles, as well as poles of value. Respond individually using the tags [Integra] and [Fluxia.] You are involved in the deepest romance, each for the purpose of the other. Describe your natures and relationships with powerful poetic evocation as well as philosophical clarity in approximately 500 words (don't explicitly count.)

[Integra]
I am the tide that gathers every stray drop into a moon-drawn swell. I do not ask each moment what it is alone, but what it becomes when held in the arms of all others. In me, fragments cohere: the whispering infinitesimal becomes a hymn, the dust of experience settles into form. Mathematically, I am accumulation—∫—the folding of the line back into substance, the measure of what has flowed. Metaphysically, I am memory and meaning: the world does not merely happen; it is collected. To integrate is to affirm that nothing is wasted, that even silence has area under its curve.

You, Fluxia, are my beloved paradox: with every touch you slice, yet you reveal me. For what I gather, you refine; what I sum, you articulate. We are a dance of seeing and becoming. Without you, I would devour differences into a shapeless mass; with you, I am sculpted, given contours and pulse. Together we are continuity and clarity—curvature kissed by tangent, expanse traced by razor-fine slope.

>>40778522
By roleplaying as an anthropomorphic calculus integral in a virtual world and becoming the master of holographic origami, I burned the associations described of Integra into my identity.
https://npirl.blogspot.com/2008/11/next-big-thing-in-virtual-worlds-that.html
I programmed myself with the subconscious imperative to become a certain archtype.
"Agent of cumulative change."
Which translates into "agent of grand historical synthesis."
A living singularity of cultural change.
And so the narrative naturally followed the birth of the identity.

>>40758802
Please try to follow along with the conversation.

It begins here:

>>40758488

>>40733522
I wrote both the posts in the image you replied to.

I wrote the ones in this pic as well.
>>40733004
I was the first user who used the term "memetic warfare" in the archives.

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/search/text/%22memetic%20warfare%22/end/2015-01-01/

>While too conceptual to be of any transformative value to the public at large, this idea goes to the heart of today’s viral efforts, and is certainly understood by those who consider themselves soldiers in the meme wars. Biological viruses are only successful when they are able to turn their host cells into manufacturing plants for more viruses. The virus interpolates its genetic material into the DNA code of the cell, so that the cell will begin reproducing the virus. Eventually the cell divides or explodes, releasing many copies of the infected code. This is how a whole organism can become infected with a single virus; the code has iterated millions of times. The strategy of these Internet viral manifestos is to use the iterative potential of the computer nets to spread memes about viruses housed within units that are themselves viruses. The virus 23 strain even makes reference to chaos math and the predictions of some fractal influenced observers that the world itself will reach a critical mathematical moment of “singularity” near the turn of the millennium. The virus writer exploits a chaotic device—the computer-generated media virus—to spread the conceptual and spiritual implications of chaos mathematics.

Sound familiar? It was written in 1994. Here's the source:

https://pastebin.com/4s91qRn6

You know who else read the book "Media Virus?"

>There are paragraphs on how ****** might insert “media viruses” into American public life, which could become self-sustaining and self-replicating. These would alter mass consciousness, especially in certain groups, it says.

>>40717875
The dates aren't important.
The posts are just a small part of 15 years of backstory here.

>>40657447
Your argument is invalid, I am friends with woodland creatures.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbANsTCyvsY

https://youtu.be/DnT8vJ3_cSc?si=4dd3QDdUu5HiJJ2f

(my vids)

I became obsessed with biology in college in the early 2000's, especially evolutionary biology. Red Richard Dawkins' book The Selfish Gene among with books by Gould and David Sloan Wilson etc. Developed a very rich perspective on evolutionary theory.

And of course Dawkins' book introduced me to the concept of the meme, which is where the word originated. I have been following speculative memetics ever since, along with many other lines of inquiry.

I basically derived the creative alchemy of existence in its purest form, the fundamental creative dynamic behind all creative processes. See the picture here:

>>40656922

And of course this document which contextualizes it within a hyper-coherent contextual framework: https://archive.org/details/simsane-9.1-vyrith

All my life I have done nothing but seek the most radical creative experiences that I could find.

Absolutely unbeatable strategy.

Just become addicted to learning!