>>17809536
>Rome, 382
So we have a local council (which did not have jurisdiction over the whole Church), which is questionable if it even produced a list of canon, and which was not cited as some defining authority on the canon in subsequent centuries. And even if it had defined a canon, it would not be the first time such a thing was done.
In other words, your claim did not happen historically. This is an exercise in myth making
>It take intellect and sagacity to figure out which ones are God breathed and which weren't
Let's say 'yes'. How would this impugn anything I said?
>Because God left no Bible.
Yes sir, he *did* leave a bible by inspiring it.
>Heretic. Ignored
It's easy to preserve false belief by ignoring the truth
>HOW?
It has no basis in scripture, and it contradicts scripture by retreating from the world (which we are instructed to conquer and baptize) and repudiating holy marriage (which is the highest Christian life and God's will for mankind).
>>17809539
What are these guys doing?