>>713282590
>Hell, even if it was, why does that make the game immune from being laughed at exactly?
I was replying to an anon that was saying that people don't mind wokeness when it's genuine. I brought Relooted up because it's genuine wokeness from an indie team in bumfuck South Africa, and it still got a ton of controversy. The thread was followed by multiple anons making fun of the game and saying they don't care if it's genuine or not.

You have proven my point for me. We're in agreement. This anon >>713280987 is wrong.