Search Results
6/14/2025, 2:28:39 PM
>>17763175
Structual issues in it's bureacuracy, Stalin's purges knocked out many of the true believers and left self-interested liberal sychophants like Khrushchev and Beria. Stalin himself was a true believer, but his paranoia led him to see disagreements from loyal followers as signs of being factionalist traitors, and asskissers as signs of loyalty. This meant that people offering genuinely good faith advice, often ended up demoted or even on the chopping block. It should be noted as well, Beria was a hyper-factionalist shithead and basically controlled what information went in and out from Stalin, this meant Beria started knocking out true believers so when Stalin kicked it, he could get into power and reform the USSR into a liberal state. Beria immediately after Stalin died was in deep contact with the UK to "reform" the USSR.
Nonmenklatura system basically led to a similar system like Chinese imperial system, where the system becomes a hyper-competitive "meritocracy" where you actively sabotage other agencies and fellow bureaucrats so you can get the most "merits" to level up through the system. This is how Chinese imperial system worked and that system is INFAMOUS for its backstabbing and scheming.
In the USSR this famously led to the N1 rocket engines being sabotaged by inter-deprtmental rivaly, and the Soviet internet being ass fucked by rival departments
>The OGAS proposal was resented by some liberals as excessive central control,[9] but failed primarily because of bureaucratic infighting. It was under the auspices of the Central Statistical Administration, and fell afoul of Vasily Garbuzov, who saw a threat to his Ministry of Finance.[3][4][9] When EGSVT[note 1] failed, the next attempt, SOFE,[note 2] was done in 1964 by Nikolay Fedorenko, who attempted to build an information network that could be used in economic planning in Soviet Union's planned economy. The project was successful at a micro-level but did not spread into wide use.[10]
Structual issues in it's bureacuracy, Stalin's purges knocked out many of the true believers and left self-interested liberal sychophants like Khrushchev and Beria. Stalin himself was a true believer, but his paranoia led him to see disagreements from loyal followers as signs of being factionalist traitors, and asskissers as signs of loyalty. This meant that people offering genuinely good faith advice, often ended up demoted or even on the chopping block. It should be noted as well, Beria was a hyper-factionalist shithead and basically controlled what information went in and out from Stalin, this meant Beria started knocking out true believers so when Stalin kicked it, he could get into power and reform the USSR into a liberal state. Beria immediately after Stalin died was in deep contact with the UK to "reform" the USSR.
Nonmenklatura system basically led to a similar system like Chinese imperial system, where the system becomes a hyper-competitive "meritocracy" where you actively sabotage other agencies and fellow bureaucrats so you can get the most "merits" to level up through the system. This is how Chinese imperial system worked and that system is INFAMOUS for its backstabbing and scheming.
In the USSR this famously led to the N1 rocket engines being sabotaged by inter-deprtmental rivaly, and the Soviet internet being ass fucked by rival departments
>The OGAS proposal was resented by some liberals as excessive central control,[9] but failed primarily because of bureaucratic infighting. It was under the auspices of the Central Statistical Administration, and fell afoul of Vasily Garbuzov, who saw a threat to his Ministry of Finance.[3][4][9] When EGSVT[note 1] failed, the next attempt, SOFE,[note 2] was done in 1964 by Nikolay Fedorenko, who attempted to build an information network that could be used in economic planning in Soviet Union's planned economy. The project was successful at a micro-level but did not spread into wide use.[10]
Page 1