>>510288713
So you just googled the interview, haven't watch it, and have no idea if the clip you posted is even in it then? Got it.
That's a very kikish thing to do BTW. Very pilpul in nature. You post a huge piece of text as proof and demand your opponent go through it themselves to find your own evidence for you.

I never said you were right.
I'm not even joking.

>>510288431
I agree.