Search Results
7/26/2025, 6:07:36 AM
>>40503743
you're welcome, remember for most of human history and even today sexual crimes can only happen if there is a male in the picture and therefore no dick no sex
you're welcome, remember for most of human history and even today sexual crimes can only happen if there is a male in the picture and therefore no dick no sex
7/26/2025, 12:14:04 AM
>>17872008
>that law was meant to remove this as a point of potential discrimination.
Sodomy is an abomination and has historically always been treated as such in our legal system. Of course it is a point of discrimination. These people are worthy of death for what they have done, just like drug dealers and drug cartels, anon.
This has always been our values as Americans historically and these are my values today.
>hell I'm sure some retards here think it should even between consenting adults
It is possible for two people who consent to something to commit a crime. For example, if two consenting adults agree to spread radioactive waste into the environment, they are both guilty of a serious crime. If they agree to counterfeit money, they are guilty.
>and the bill should've been criticized on its actual merit
I don't know about you, but I use this article as an example of what kind of lawmakers California has right now. These people weren't around in the political or legislative sphere in the 1930s, they are a different kind of threat to freedom and our way of life. They want to spread HIV/AIDS for example, and recruit children by chemically castrating them at youth, and many of them would even be willing to kidnap children from other states to do it. They criticize anyone who thinks that is wrong as being "antisemitic." That was my point.
>that law was meant to remove this as a point of potential discrimination.
Sodomy is an abomination and has historically always been treated as such in our legal system. Of course it is a point of discrimination. These people are worthy of death for what they have done, just like drug dealers and drug cartels, anon.
This has always been our values as Americans historically and these are my values today.
>hell I'm sure some retards here think it should even between consenting adults
It is possible for two people who consent to something to commit a crime. For example, if two consenting adults agree to spread radioactive waste into the environment, they are both guilty of a serious crime. If they agree to counterfeit money, they are guilty.
>and the bill should've been criticized on its actual merit
I don't know about you, but I use this article as an example of what kind of lawmakers California has right now. These people weren't around in the political or legislative sphere in the 1930s, they are a different kind of threat to freedom and our way of life. They want to spread HIV/AIDS for example, and recruit children by chemically castrating them at youth, and many of them would even be willing to kidnap children from other states to do it. They criticize anyone who thinks that is wrong as being "antisemitic." That was my point.
Page 1