Search Results
7/17/2025, 6:16:44 PM
>>510638194
sounds like your mind is completely closed to the idea, not just skeptical but resistant to even considering the possibility.
you seem to dismiss anything that doesn't fit within the framework of empirical materialism, but that framework has its own limitations.
it's great at describing mechanisms, but struggles when it comes to meaning purpose or consciousness.
is the worldview of atheist materialism really that satisfying in its explanatory power?
it tells us what things are made of, sure, but not why they matters, why beauty moves us, why morality feels binding, or why we even asks these questions in the first place. and if those kind of questions are just evolutionary accidents or neurological illusions, what are we left with? a worldview that explains the gears of the universe but leaves us cold in the face of wonder.
you can call appeals to beauty or awe "primitive," but isn't it interesting that the impulse to search for something greater has been a constant across all of human history and culture? maybe it's not just outdated superstition, maybe it's a sign that the purely material story is missing something.
sounds like your mind is completely closed to the idea, not just skeptical but resistant to even considering the possibility.
you seem to dismiss anything that doesn't fit within the framework of empirical materialism, but that framework has its own limitations.
it's great at describing mechanisms, but struggles when it comes to meaning purpose or consciousness.
is the worldview of atheist materialism really that satisfying in its explanatory power?
it tells us what things are made of, sure, but not why they matters, why beauty moves us, why morality feels binding, or why we even asks these questions in the first place. and if those kind of questions are just evolutionary accidents or neurological illusions, what are we left with? a worldview that explains the gears of the universe but leaves us cold in the face of wonder.
you can call appeals to beauty or awe "primitive," but isn't it interesting that the impulse to search for something greater has been a constant across all of human history and culture? maybe it's not just outdated superstition, maybe it's a sign that the purely material story is missing something.
7/17/2025, 6:16:44 PM
>>22949303
sounds like your mind is completely closed to the idea, not just skeptical but resistant to even considering the possibility.
you seem to dismiss anything that doesn't fit within the framework of empirical materialism, but that framework has its own limitations.
it's great at describing mechanisms, but struggles when it comes to meaning purpose or consciousness.
is the worldview of atheist materialism really that satisfying in its explanatory power?
it tells us what things are made of, sure, but not why they matters, why beauty moves us, why morality feels binding, or why we even asks these questions in the first place. and if those kind of questions are just evolutionary accidents or neurological illusions, what are we left with? a worldview that explains the gears of the universe but leaves us cold in the face of wonder.
you can call appeals to beauty or awe "primitive," but isn't it interesting that the impulse to search for something greater has been a constant across all of human history and culture? maybe it's not just outdated superstition, maybe it's a sign that the purely material story is missing something.
sounds like your mind is completely closed to the idea, not just skeptical but resistant to even considering the possibility.
you seem to dismiss anything that doesn't fit within the framework of empirical materialism, but that framework has its own limitations.
it's great at describing mechanisms, but struggles when it comes to meaning purpose or consciousness.
is the worldview of atheist materialism really that satisfying in its explanatory power?
it tells us what things are made of, sure, but not why they matters, why beauty moves us, why morality feels binding, or why we even asks these questions in the first place. and if those kind of questions are just evolutionary accidents or neurological illusions, what are we left with? a worldview that explains the gears of the universe but leaves us cold in the face of wonder.
you can call appeals to beauty or awe "primitive," but isn't it interesting that the impulse to search for something greater has been a constant across all of human history and culture? maybe it's not just outdated superstition, maybe it's a sign that the purely material story is missing something.
Page 1