Search Results
7/3/2025, 12:31:30 AM
>>149242517
I think a good first step, regardless of whether it's an e-celeb or a 4chan critique post, is to give examples of something you like, or that you feel instead achieved the intent of what the thing you are critiquing failed at. Tip your personal hand a little.
Just tearing stuff down is easy to do, even in bad faith and if your target didn't really evoke any strong reaction out of you. It's not the same as the opinion of an actual industry creator, but I have a lot more respect for the opinion of someone who is willing to open themselves to counter-criticism by holding up something they like as an example.
If it's a weak comparison, you can more easily dismiss the reviewer. If it's a good one, it makes the conversation less one-sided, reveals the reviewer's own tastes and biases a little and gives a potential recommendation.
I think a good first step, regardless of whether it's an e-celeb or a 4chan critique post, is to give examples of something you like, or that you feel instead achieved the intent of what the thing you are critiquing failed at. Tip your personal hand a little.
Just tearing stuff down is easy to do, even in bad faith and if your target didn't really evoke any strong reaction out of you. It's not the same as the opinion of an actual industry creator, but I have a lot more respect for the opinion of someone who is willing to open themselves to counter-criticism by holding up something they like as an example.
If it's a weak comparison, you can more easily dismiss the reviewer. If it's a good one, it makes the conversation less one-sided, reveals the reviewer's own tastes and biases a little and gives a potential recommendation.
Page 1