Search Results
7/20/2025, 3:07:55 PM
6/16/2025, 5:02:48 PM
>>935854731
> first principal component doesn’t prove it captures the essence of intelligence, it just shows it's the strongest statistical trend in a test designed to find it.
Yes, how does this refute g or IQ??? It absolutely captures the essence of intelligence (it IS intelligence, by definition).
>PCA finds structure because it’s built to; that doesn’t mean g is biologically real or that it maps cleanly onto intelligence in the wild.
What do you think intelligence is, then; Do YOU have a better definition (one that psychologists will accept). g is biologically real BTW: picrel.
> first principal component doesn’t prove it captures the essence of intelligence, it just shows it's the strongest statistical trend in a test designed to find it.
Yes, how does this refute g or IQ??? It absolutely captures the essence of intelligence (it IS intelligence, by definition).
>PCA finds structure because it’s built to; that doesn’t mean g is biologically real or that it maps cleanly onto intelligence in the wild.
What do you think intelligence is, then; Do YOU have a better definition (one that psychologists will accept). g is biologically real BTW: picrel.
Page 1