Search Results
7/9/2025, 4:58:44 PM
>>714971875
>>714972237
according to google search and youtube tech channels, Intel's chips are the root cause, with Intel not only refusing refunds on release (which I didn't know) but also shifting the blame to motherboard manufacturers
>>714971974
>>714971974
>im curious what specifically he means by the performance degrading
"Impact:
While the issue was resolved, processors already affected may still experience instability, and the fix does not reverse any existing damage."
Welp, since it's a manufacturing issue that physically degrades faster than prior generation Intel chips, it is a sort of an impending doom and, even, if it's fixed, the chip is already damaged, considered the fact that it already came damaged from the manufacturer.
>>714972237
according to google search and youtube tech channels, Intel's chips are the root cause, with Intel not only refusing refunds on release (which I didn't know) but also shifting the blame to motherboard manufacturers
>>714971974
>>714971974
>im curious what specifically he means by the performance degrading
"Impact:
While the issue was resolved, processors already affected may still experience instability, and the fix does not reverse any existing damage."
Welp, since it's a manufacturing issue that physically degrades faster than prior generation Intel chips, it is a sort of an impending doom and, even, if it's fixed, the chip is already damaged, considered the fact that it already came damaged from the manufacturer.
Page 1