>>716347343
cont:

>>716350710
It mostly does. Poison Ivy and Catwoman's designs are nonsense, and Moctezuma II's is eh, and there's a few weird incorrect statements in interviews here and there, but everything else that's Mesoamerican themed visually ranges from decent to excellent.

I suspect it's going to end up being the most authentic, or second most authentic (after Onyx Equinox) Mesoamerican themed piece of media released in memory that's a commercial production by a major studio (EX: excluding indie projects or indie stuff that got picked up by a publisher)

>>716353680
If you have any questions or skepticism about anything I posted let me know and I'd be happy to clarify. I know you said that for you it's less an issue of if i'm being genuine (and I'd hope you would agree I have been, I've gone out of my way to correct and nitpick people in this thread who have downplayed sacrifices too, not just played them up) and more an issue of if the info and sources I'm going off of are reliable, but I regularly read academic papers and keep up with research, so I am actually in a position to evaluate the methodology of the sources I'm going off of, at least for a decent amount of stuff

>>716348447
They're glyphs/motifs which represent eyes or stars, refer to the subsection in the image of >>716287291

>>716355437
>>716355748
Mesoamerican stuff isn't exactly a popular topic a lot of people are into, anybody doing anything Mesoamerican related that's at least decently well done is gonna in contact with or get contacted by anybody else into the topic. It's a small world, everybody kinda knows everybody.

>>716354786
see the arch.b4k.dev link in >>716286648

>>716346398
See pic

35/?