Search Results
7/2/2025, 9:45:14 AM
>>28491413
Nothing you mentioned means anything to anyone who doesn't share your rertarded cowboy larp.
>>28491877
>All I know is I've been in a lot better riding BOF vehicles than unibody vehicles.
Because you got used to it. I bet you don't feel choked by corn syrup in your sodas either.
There are several advantages of unibody design. Let's stick to what's most important to SUVs: lower center of gravity means you can ride faster and car doesn't feel like it's going to turn over on its side (because it will if you try turning with faster speed). That's espacially important in SUVs and that's why when your goal is transport of any amount of people as fast, safe and comfortable as possible, unibody is way to go. Even modern buses are more often unibody.
Things like bad roads can be overcome with better suspension in unibody, but you can't change physics when you try riding faster with BOF. I'm not even touching stuff like lightweight (so manufacturers can squeeze more fancy stuff) and lower fuel consumption (greater range).
"Luxurious" or even "premium" SUV designed on frame is oxymoron. GM was trying to sell Escalade to rich Russians. They even opened assembly plants in Russia and Belarus to overcome stuff like import costs or innate poor built quality of American cars. But even Russians sticked to Range Rover or Mercedes or BMW. Just like Arabs and just like everyone else in the world except for Americans.
Nothing you mentioned means anything to anyone who doesn't share your rertarded cowboy larp.
>>28491877
>All I know is I've been in a lot better riding BOF vehicles than unibody vehicles.
Because you got used to it. I bet you don't feel choked by corn syrup in your sodas either.
There are several advantages of unibody design. Let's stick to what's most important to SUVs: lower center of gravity means you can ride faster and car doesn't feel like it's going to turn over on its side (because it will if you try turning with faster speed). That's espacially important in SUVs and that's why when your goal is transport of any amount of people as fast, safe and comfortable as possible, unibody is way to go. Even modern buses are more often unibody.
Things like bad roads can be overcome with better suspension in unibody, but you can't change physics when you try riding faster with BOF. I'm not even touching stuff like lightweight (so manufacturers can squeeze more fancy stuff) and lower fuel consumption (greater range).
"Luxurious" or even "premium" SUV designed on frame is oxymoron. GM was trying to sell Escalade to rich Russians. They even opened assembly plants in Russia and Belarus to overcome stuff like import costs or innate poor built quality of American cars. But even Russians sticked to Range Rover or Mercedes or BMW. Just like Arabs and just like everyone else in the world except for Americans.
Page 1