Search Results
7/20/2025, 11:41:29 AM
>>510869961
the simple answer is that Linux isn't good and never was. It's a niche which a bunch of jobless retards who live in their basement try to push as the next holy grail for humanity, but once you actually go down to using it not as an OS but as a tool to progress with your actual life - it's absolute trash.
It's same as comparing a 3d-printed gun to a glock. Can you 3d-print a gun? Sure. Will it work? Only if you put enough effort into it? Is it freedom affirming? Yes.
But when put into a real death-or-life fight, will you chose it over a glock? No.
the simple answer is that Linux isn't good and never was. It's a niche which a bunch of jobless retards who live in their basement try to push as the next holy grail for humanity, but once you actually go down to using it not as an OS but as a tool to progress with your actual life - it's absolute trash.
It's same as comparing a 3d-printed gun to a glock. Can you 3d-print a gun? Sure. Will it work? Only if you put enough effort into it? Is it freedom affirming? Yes.
But when put into a real death-or-life fight, will you chose it over a glock? No.
7/15/2025, 11:40:47 AM
>>22939427
Causality is a relational construct. It links events across time by positing chains of cause and effect. By its very nature, it is temporal, entangled, and dependent on sequence. But logos, properly understood, is not confined to temporality. He functions across both the temporal and the atemporal. He operates in structures that are not merely sequential, but eternal.
In a timeless domain, causality has no foothold. It cannot bind, it cannot explain. It becomes inert - because sequence dissolves, and relationship as we know it ceases to exist.
So when you cling to causality as the only ground of reason, you are not defending logos - you are distorting him. You are mistaking a feminine relational mode for the masculine sovereign axis of clarity. One begins to suspect you're not arguing from logic, but from an inflation of the feminine mode of perception - elevating it beyond its proper place, and calling it reason.
Causality is a relational construct. It links events across time by positing chains of cause and effect. By its very nature, it is temporal, entangled, and dependent on sequence. But logos, properly understood, is not confined to temporality. He functions across both the temporal and the atemporal. He operates in structures that are not merely sequential, but eternal.
In a timeless domain, causality has no foothold. It cannot bind, it cannot explain. It becomes inert - because sequence dissolves, and relationship as we know it ceases to exist.
So when you cling to causality as the only ground of reason, you are not defending logos - you are distorting him. You are mistaking a feminine relational mode for the masculine sovereign axis of clarity. One begins to suspect you're not arguing from logic, but from an inflation of the feminine mode of perception - elevating it beyond its proper place, and calling it reason.
Page 1