>>105882488
>tv is terrible compared to a monitor
in what ways? it's better in everything, except ppi and higher hz now a days, and the fact that no qdoled exists in sub 55" range
>it has tv os that takes screenshots and sends the data to china
keep it offline, firmware updates is good though, also why china when it's koreans?
>its ppi is bad because its so large
same ppi as 27" 1440p
>32" 4k is much better
here we go into subjective opinion again, you can use less scaling more effectively on 42" too
already tried 32"
>the monitors have vastly higher hz
240 vs 144-165 currently, your one legitimate point, you sacrifice size and hdr for more hz

>>105882521
>lg oleds have terrible real scene brightness and the abl on them are overkill
should be better than all current oled monitors, real scene brightness in hdr is like a real 800 nits compared to monitors which are hovering the 400 line
this is before I even consider the 55" tiers which now we are talking 400-500 nits full screen and 2000 nits small window peak

>also woled has washed out colors in HDR.
again should be better than monitors, but yes I would want QD instead but no QD exists past 32 up to 55

>>105882531
that's for esports, this is the opposite
I don't think I would take 1440p high hz over 4k either
idk if I would take 27" over 32" either

>>105882545
all oleds have this though, and the tvs beat monitors, only way to escape this is buy miniled