Search Results
7/23/2025, 3:44:08 AM
>>17864675
>I'm not reading that outdated 20 year old slop, genetic science has advanced dramatically since then
i knew you would reply that, it's not outdated, worthless tranny, it's comparing actual hair, eye and skin color of real people with their gene frequencies and see which one has higher chances of blonde hairs vs brown
it's not a "tool", this is basic math, it can't get outdated
and here another newer study from 2018
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07691-z
>The the modern concensus is absolutely clear that rs12821256 is the main gene for blondism
nope, there's no such consensus, why don't you post something proving this consensus, consensus doesn't means "this snp increases the chances of blonde hairs", that's not a consensus, you have to find something that says "this snp is the main contributor to blonde hairs in europeans"
>I'm not reading that outdated 20 year old slop, genetic science has advanced dramatically since then
i knew you would reply that, it's not outdated, worthless tranny, it's comparing actual hair, eye and skin color of real people with their gene frequencies and see which one has higher chances of blonde hairs vs brown
it's not a "tool", this is basic math, it can't get outdated
and here another newer study from 2018
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07691-z
>The the modern concensus is absolutely clear that rs12821256 is the main gene for blondism
nope, there's no such consensus, why don't you post something proving this consensus, consensus doesn't means "this snp increases the chances of blonde hairs", that's not a consensus, you have to find something that says "this snp is the main contributor to blonde hairs in europeans"
Page 1