Search Results
7/13/2025, 3:38:38 AM
>>510221067
Zero women who are actually single will pick up the "single" cart
I've been to things like this before, but it was a party with cups. Pretty much ALL the girls picked the "taken" cups.
Curiously many men had the "single" cup.
There was a third cup, that's the one I picked. I think it was a "it's complicated" cup.
Zero women who are actually single will pick up the "single" cart
I've been to things like this before, but it was a party with cups. Pretty much ALL the girls picked the "taken" cups.
Curiously many men had the "single" cup.
There was a third cup, that's the one I picked. I think it was a "it's complicated" cup.
ID: w6FLGGpO/biz/60478629#60484815
6/10/2025, 4:48:20 PM
>>60484754
>if executed respectfully
There is no "respectful" way to ethnically cleanse a population. You can't politely force people from their homes.
>suffering in this context is weighted based on a pyramid of necessities in which death from hunger vastly eclipse the psychological suffering from leaving emotionally-relatable lands
You're creating a false choice. Palestinians aren't choosing between starvation and leaving - they're being killed and displaced by force. Also calling it "emotionally-relatable lands" is dishonest framing. It's where their families have lived for generations.
>israel is geopolitically surrounded by non-allies which sustains an overall sentiment of unsafety
So Israel's "sentiment of unsafety" justifies removing an entire population? By that logic, any country that feels threatened could ethnically cleanse minorities. Should Turkey relocate Kurds? Should China relocate Uyghurs? Where does it end?
>anything is justified if its existential
This is literally the logic used to justify every genocide in history. The Nazis claimed Jews were an existential threat. Rwanda's Hutu Power claimed Tutsis were an existential threat. The Khmer Rouge claimed educated people were an existential threat.
You're using academic language to say "might makes right" and "the strong can remove the weak if they feel threatened." That's not sophisticated thinking, it's just ethnic cleansing under international law. This even isn't about politics but about fundamental human rights..
Question, If "anything is justified if existential," would Palestinians be justified in using ANY means to resist being ethnically cleansed? Or does this logic only apply to the side with more power?
>if executed respectfully
There is no "respectful" way to ethnically cleanse a population. You can't politely force people from their homes.
>suffering in this context is weighted based on a pyramid of necessities in which death from hunger vastly eclipse the psychological suffering from leaving emotionally-relatable lands
You're creating a false choice. Palestinians aren't choosing between starvation and leaving - they're being killed and displaced by force. Also calling it "emotionally-relatable lands" is dishonest framing. It's where their families have lived for generations.
>israel is geopolitically surrounded by non-allies which sustains an overall sentiment of unsafety
So Israel's "sentiment of unsafety" justifies removing an entire population? By that logic, any country that feels threatened could ethnically cleanse minorities. Should Turkey relocate Kurds? Should China relocate Uyghurs? Where does it end?
>anything is justified if its existential
This is literally the logic used to justify every genocide in history. The Nazis claimed Jews were an existential threat. Rwanda's Hutu Power claimed Tutsis were an existential threat. The Khmer Rouge claimed educated people were an existential threat.
You're using academic language to say "might makes right" and "the strong can remove the weak if they feel threatened." That's not sophisticated thinking, it's just ethnic cleansing under international law. This even isn't about politics but about fundamental human rights..
Question, If "anything is justified if existential," would Palestinians be justified in using ANY means to resist being ethnically cleansed? Or does this logic only apply to the side with more power?
Page 1