Search Results
6/14/2025, 1:51:57 AM
>>105586810
>Flux
>+488 ms (100%) (CFG)
>+426 ms (87%) (NAG)
So it's not much slower than using CFG, what's the point then?
>Flux
>+488 ms (100%) (CFG)
>+426 ms (87%) (NAG)
So it's not much slower than using CFG, what's the point then?
Page 1