>>81537751
>That is disingenuous
As opposed to...
>The suffering is there
Literal devil's proof.
>opposite of suffering
Impossible as per above.

>Everyone has the opportunity to reflect on the past in downtime, therefore they're pampered, by your own definition.
"People with mental or cognitive deficiencies or illnesses aren't people" is pretty Jungian alright.

>This is distinctly anti-Jungian. The subjective is not fictional.
I'll tell Jung once I'll resurrect him that you either debunked the transcendent function or have no reading comprehension, I guess.

>That's where you're wrong.
I can feel the opposite of pain towards depression, so no.

>>And what the term "suffering" would be a tool for?
>Individuation?
Subpar tool with better alternatives, then.

>The same way I would say pain is not a social construct.
Ok, show suffering being as objectively verified as pain.