>>510076556
A kike made that

>>507683530
>he will lose the mid terms
That was already baked into the cake. He's managed to alienate his base, rile up his opposition, and accomplish nothing. Pretty impressive

>>712858949
nta, but yeah games have to stay $50-$60. It's not my fault there's inflation; corporations certainly have more power to stop the government from printing money to give to them than I do. Bottom line, it's simple math. If the cost of things go up, and users' income doesn't, they stop buying the thing. Nothing else matters. No excuse or asinine argument changes that.