>>508834251
>r should they have gone the anglo way and killed all of them?
Blood libel.

https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2008/12/historical-revision-versus-holocaust-denial/

>The loss of the population was so high that it was partially responsible for the myth of the Americas as "virgin wilderness". By the time significant European colonization was underway, native populations had already been reduced by 90%. This resulted in settlements vanishing and cultivated fields being abandoned. Since forests were recovering, the colonists had an impression of a land that was an untamed wilderness.[43]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_disease_and_epidemics

https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~alcoze/for398/class/pristinemyth.html

>In Peru, more than 50% of the previously-uncontacted Nahua tribe were wiped out following oil exploration on their land in the early 1980s, and the same tragedy engulfed the Murunahua in the mid-1990s after being forcibly contacted by illegal mahogany loggers.
https://www.survivalinternational.org/articles/3106-uncontacted-tribes-the-threats

>On the Yurua River I met people from the Murunahua tribe, discovered for the first time in the mid-1990s by illegal loggers. The presence of loggers in areas inhabited by uncontacted tribes is extremely dangerous; in the Amazon, up to 90% of entire groups have been wiped out by disease after first contact with outsiders. Jorge, one of the surviving Murunahua, told me: "When the loggers made contact with us we came out of the jungle. Then the disease came, although we didn't know what a cold was then. Half of my people died. My aunt died. My nephew died. The old people especially. When the old people came out of the jungle they had no resistance to the disease."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/mar/27/peru-international-aid-and-development

>>507184154
>genocide 60 million natives

Europeans didn't even wipe out the Indians, they live there to this day and with special privileges even.

The 'Indian massacre', it's totally and completely blown out of proportion by Jewish textbooks (one of the ways Jews push their propaganda is by buying publishing companies that print school textbooks) and then reinforced by Jewish Hollywood movies.

Most people think that Whites simply came to land already settled by Indians and massacred everyone in their way.
That is Jewish projection by the way, because that is exactly what THEY are doing in Palestine, when they got their weapons and paper from the British saying half of Palestine is theirs, they moved in and massacred all Palestinian families in their homes and took them over, changed village names to Hebrew and claimed that they always were there and grandpa Shlomo actually built the house.
But that didn't happen in North America, not at all.

You'd think from Jewish Hollywood movies that there was constant fighting between the Indians and Americans, that Indians were slaughtered en-masse, but that is not true at all.
In fact they were mostly trading partners and peaceful towards each other, surely there was Indian raids to American caravans and towns and such, and retaliations by the Americans, but in the height of the killing Americans only killed ~450 Indians per year, while Indians also killing as many Americans, so many of the killings were also in self-defense.
Compared that to the 15,000 murders non-whites commit each year in USA, and the non-white criminals of today are massacring 33x times the amount that Americans were ever killing Indians.

So the real massacre is actually going today, and its being perpetrated by non-whites.
But of course the Jewish media portrays it differently, they always hide the statistics and the truth to paint a very different kind of image than what is the reality.