>>714858036
>he didn't ignore anything
Yes he did.

> he struck at the heart of the issue people like you faggots are too afraid to say out loud
No he did not, nigger. He started complaining about eugenics, when the topic was on heritable characteristics generally, and why people aren't allowed to acknowledge that they are. These are not the same thing.

Your issue (as is his) is that you're conflating the end of the slope for being the "heart" of the argument,

>the three people he quoted inside his post almost explicitly refer to this
Oh okay, lets go over them.

>you're not allowed to wonder that.

>Also genetics can work on people, we know and recognize inheritable diseases and that certain populations are prone to certain conditions. However, insinuation that maybe intelligence can be a heritable characteristic, just as it is in literally every living creature with DNA on this planet, is not allowed
This does not refer to eugenics, let alone that it's good. The point being made is more akin to "You are not allowed to acknowledge that genetics have an effect on observable traits".

>Genetics do work like that it's just (((science))) doesn't want you to believe it.
Literally the exact same thing as the prior quotation.

And the finally post is the implication that you'll be dragged out of the conversation by outside parties (actually a concern in some countries).

So in short, no, my statement that the """reasonable""" guy missed the point (I think deliberately) is sound.

>don't pretend to be retarded
You first, nigger.