Search Results
7/9/2025, 7:30:43 AM
>>509896569
>reposting
Anders Puck Nielsen says in his latest video that a major concern right now is the United States’ sudden halt in weapons deliveries to Ukraine. He points out the confusion surrounding U.S. policy—while Donald Trump has recently used more pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia rhetoric, the Pentagon has paused crucial arms shipments, citing the need to assess the impact on U.S. military readiness. Nielsen dismisses this as “total BS,” explaining that the U.S. is not giving Ukraine more than it can produce or replace.
He emphasizes that the decision to stop arms deliveries is entirely political, and the weapons being withheld include critical air defense systems needed to counter intensified Russian attacks.
Nielsen goes on to say that this kind of mixed messaging—saying the U.S. supports Ukraine while doing the opposite—is exactly the kind of tactic someone trying to help Russia would use. He stresses that he’s not claiming this is Trump’s intention, but if Trump did want to aid Putin’s summer offensive, this is precisely what it would look like: stalling military aid while pacifying allies with promises of future support.
He ends with a warning that European politicians must stay alert and not be lulled into inaction by the U.S.’s unclear signals.
> Even though Trump has since said that weapons deliveries to Ukraine will resume, Anders Puck Nielsen’s core message in the video still holds true—unless those weapons actually arrive in Ukraine, the political signaling is meaningles
>reposting
Anders Puck Nielsen says in his latest video that a major concern right now is the United States’ sudden halt in weapons deliveries to Ukraine. He points out the confusion surrounding U.S. policy—while Donald Trump has recently used more pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia rhetoric, the Pentagon has paused crucial arms shipments, citing the need to assess the impact on U.S. military readiness. Nielsen dismisses this as “total BS,” explaining that the U.S. is not giving Ukraine more than it can produce or replace.
He emphasizes that the decision to stop arms deliveries is entirely political, and the weapons being withheld include critical air defense systems needed to counter intensified Russian attacks.
Nielsen goes on to say that this kind of mixed messaging—saying the U.S. supports Ukraine while doing the opposite—is exactly the kind of tactic someone trying to help Russia would use. He stresses that he’s not claiming this is Trump’s intention, but if Trump did want to aid Putin’s summer offensive, this is precisely what it would look like: stalling military aid while pacifying allies with promises of future support.
He ends with a warning that European politicians must stay alert and not be lulled into inaction by the U.S.’s unclear signals.
> Even though Trump has since said that weapons deliveries to Ukraine will resume, Anders Puck Nielsen’s core message in the video still holds true—unless those weapons actually arrive in Ukraine, the political signaling is meaningles
7/6/2025, 11:40:19 PM
Anders Puck Nielsen says in his latest video that a major concern right now is the United States’ sudden halt in weapons deliveries to Ukraine. He points out the confusion surrounding U.S. policy—while Donald Trump has recently used more pro-Ukraine and anti-Russia rhetoric, the Pentagon has paused crucial arms shipments, citing the need to assess the impact on U.S. military readiness. Nielsen dismisses this as “total BS,” explaining that the U.S. is not giving Ukraine more than it can produce or replace.
He emphasizes that the decision to stop arms deliveries is entirely political, and the weapons being withheld include critical air defense systems needed to counter intensified Russian attacks.
Nielsen goes on to say that this kind of mixed messaging—saying the U.S. supports Ukraine while doing the opposite—is exactly the kind of tactic someone trying to help Russia would use. He stresses that he’s not claiming this is Trump’s intention, but if Trump did want to aid Putin’s summer offensive, this is precisely what it would look like: stalling military aid while pacifying allies with promises of future support.
He ends with a warning that European politicians must stay alert and not be lulled into inaction by the U.S.’s unclear signals.
He emphasizes that the decision to stop arms deliveries is entirely political, and the weapons being withheld include critical air defense systems needed to counter intensified Russian attacks.
Nielsen goes on to say that this kind of mixed messaging—saying the U.S. supports Ukraine while doing the opposite—is exactly the kind of tactic someone trying to help Russia would use. He stresses that he’s not claiming this is Trump’s intention, but if Trump did want to aid Putin’s summer offensive, this is precisely what it would look like: stalling military aid while pacifying allies with promises of future support.
He ends with a warning that European politicians must stay alert and not be lulled into inaction by the U.S.’s unclear signals.
Page 1