Search Results
7/13/2025, 9:27:15 PM
>>63979611
>Of course. HPM can't induce optical noise.
>irrelevant.
Not irrelevant when you're using it as your source material for your argument. Now, find it, easily, like you claimed.
>Find the spot size for the multiple HPM systems there's in development... do your part to back your spam.
Not my place. You made the claim, you back it up. Not my responsibility to refute your claim you haven't given sources to prove.
>Conditionally, any competent RF engineer avoids micro-scale damage (thermal and arcing)
So, not chinsect, shitskin, or vatnig. Got it.
>I accept your concession.
My concession that your whole team is getting sent to visit hell? Glad you agree!
>That only shows a unshielded (EM shielding) drone, guess what, even the thinnest aluminum foil will solve that problem (if done correctly) and HPM are terrible to induce joule heating in that situation, the shield wouldn't be gradually degraded.
Then why didn't Hamas just simply go to the local shop, grad some foil for $4 and BTFO of the multi-billion dollar Israeli military?
>You're just proving that HPM weapons HAVE to rely on a conditional: a bad design and the enemy refusing to do something simple and that every single radio maker has been doing since WWII... EM shielding. BTW the FCC will love to know who's making drones with no-shielding, that EM noise...
Then your expensive, shielded, low capacity short ranged glorified hobby drone meets the lasers, and actual interceptors part of M-LIDS.... You're just reinventing small UAVs for military use, and acting like it's a gamechanger.
>Of course. HPM can't induce optical noise.
>irrelevant.
Not irrelevant when you're using it as your source material for your argument. Now, find it, easily, like you claimed.
>Find the spot size for the multiple HPM systems there's in development... do your part to back your spam.
Not my place. You made the claim, you back it up. Not my responsibility to refute your claim you haven't given sources to prove.
>Conditionally, any competent RF engineer avoids micro-scale damage (thermal and arcing)
So, not chinsect, shitskin, or vatnig. Got it.
>I accept your concession.
My concession that your whole team is getting sent to visit hell? Glad you agree!
>That only shows a unshielded (EM shielding) drone, guess what, even the thinnest aluminum foil will solve that problem (if done correctly) and HPM are terrible to induce joule heating in that situation, the shield wouldn't be gradually degraded.
Then why didn't Hamas just simply go to the local shop, grad some foil for $4 and BTFO of the multi-billion dollar Israeli military?
>You're just proving that HPM weapons HAVE to rely on a conditional: a bad design and the enemy refusing to do something simple and that every single radio maker has been doing since WWII... EM shielding. BTW the FCC will love to know who's making drones with no-shielding, that EM noise...
Then your expensive, shielded, low capacity short ranged glorified hobby drone meets the lasers, and actual interceptors part of M-LIDS.... You're just reinventing small UAVs for military use, and acting like it's a gamechanger.
Page 1