>>531164552
well I dont interact with anyone 10 years younger than me so that could be
>>531164521
i know i know, is just that slangs do tend to last a bit more since they are actually used in day to day, not just for some quick memes, I guess mixing the two gave them a swift death
>>531164715
I think simps is more of an actual word/definition than a lingo/slang so it makes sense that it endured

and now that I have your attention, are potential levels good for anything? they seem like a skill points trap for careers