>>33306151
Alright, let me take the question seriously then.

Part of the mystery at the center of the Hermetic principle of gender is the irreconcilable nature of the feminine and masculine spirtiual perspectives from the subjective perspective.

Consider a whirlpool of water spinning at the vertex of a drain, a basin of water emptying... the masculine is the pattern, the principle of correspondence between the shape of the funnel and the fact of the funnel as a dissipativr structure. You see the funnel as a temporary concatenation of facts, yet once the water within which it inheres as a constituent elements drains fully, the funnel disappears.

This is true if all patterns. You see a mountain as fixed, the ocean as eternal, the moon as perpetual in its position only because your frame of reference flickers along at intervals of time that reference them as immutable. However, if you could speed up time, dilate the flickering, you'd see the mountains as waves of matter coalescing into patterns as finite as the vortex of the basin.

Woman, the feminine, is the matter, the feminine principle, the vase within which the pattern flashes into being. The feminine principle dictates the essential logical structure of the process of instantiation itself.

If you'd like to know how to handle strange men, you must yourself integrate the capacity to see in them whatever it is that would be useful to you.

If you cannot see that, then they cannot meaningfully coalesce.