Search Results
7/15/2025, 11:35:38 AM
>>510433136
>I have my doubts about them even providing the JASSM which was developed in the 1990s for fear of Russia developing effective measures against it.
Yea the F-16 will be an even juicier target and easier to spot if it carries even 2 of them (let alone 4 picrel)
>How many of these typhons do they even have?
Not very many, I'd guess. They said 2 batteries so 8 launchers in all.
>Seems to me they only built it to piss off the chinks.
yeah the launchers are going to be tough to hide and if Russia could pinpoint and take out the depleted uranium shells for the Challengers and Abrams I'd expect some to be taken out straight away.
>I have my doubts about them even providing the JASSM which was developed in the 1990s for fear of Russia developing effective measures against it.
Yea the F-16 will be an even juicier target and easier to spot if it carries even 2 of them (let alone 4 picrel)
>How many of these typhons do they even have?
Not very many, I'd guess. They said 2 batteries so 8 launchers in all.
>Seems to me they only built it to piss off the chinks.
yeah the launchers are going to be tough to hide and if Russia could pinpoint and take out the depleted uranium shells for the Challengers and Abrams I'd expect some to be taken out straight away.
Page 1