>>716394786
is 1 better than 0 or is 1 truly the worst experience possible, one's genuine least favorite game of all time? in the latter case obviously there's those $0.25 clicker games that you can 100% in seconds, "pet the rabbit" and shit, but a more interesting answer for me would be something like Fable 2 or any of those 7th gen casual bait games that play themselves with no possible way to fail or ever see a "game over" screen. During the entire 360/PS3 era I felt consistently disappointed and insulted by every big release, which is worse than just being bored or not relating to the appeal. there was also that DBZ """fighting""" game that was literally rock paper scissors over and over again, as in the game would pause and both players pick rock, paper, or scissors, and that was the entire game, the regular attacks and anything that wasn't that were just animations, I can't remember the name but I bet someone else can, that shit was so ass and I only played it because I couldn't remember the name of a different DBZ game that I did like so it was even more disappointing.