>>717234350
>who brought that up?
you keep pretending that everybody who argues with you is a proponent of some hyper-specific music genre
rather than somebody who thinks focusing on time signatures is stupid

>the description
you are describing plot beats and story conventions, rather than more concrete "literary devices", but instead vague tropes that tend to be played with, even in such formulaic and established genre as mystery
then again, you did start the whole literature bit with "literary elements" so maybe you didn't even mean devices in the first place but i do suggest looking up what that means

>you get information about songs and artists (...) rather than what that genre actually is
man i dunno what you are even talking about, do you just see comparasions and historical notes, and then immediately go into a blind rage, ignoring more concrete comments? or are instruments too vague, and you need a fucking objective bpm range