>>4449486
T-thanks, you too
>>4449658
I'd be fuming about the wasted chemicals though, they're so expensive now
>>4449478
Update: The sticky latch on my canon sprint just opened while I was taking it out of my pocket and it ruined the 26 shots I'd already shot with it. This is the third roll I was putting through it since I got it, after the aforementioned 2 that were ruined. I really thought this roll would be my redemption after bleaching those two...
>>4449666
Checked.
I had the same dilemma about 3 years ago and I ended up getting an rz67. Absolutely no ragrets, if anything I have buyer's relief every time the pentax is mentioned. With 6x7 I find myself wanting to shoot portrait orientation a lot more often than with 35mm because the aspect ratio is so close to square. The rotating back and the wlf make this trivial, and I'd imagine the pentax being a lot more uncomfortable to hold sideways. I quite like the wlf's perspective in general, and the removable film backs are great. You can even get a polaroid and a 645 back although I've never tried either, and I'm pretty sure the 645 back still only gives you 10 exposures.

>>510558661
>even frogs are trooned out in the us of a

>>509215976
Damn, I probably show up here more frequently then.

One month and a week later after I applied, I finally got an answer... and I got rejected...