>>81625994
>Seems cut and dry to me
Of course it does, female in-group preference or simp wiring be like that. When "doing no harm" is the greatest virtue you can think of, you know you're talking to a cockroach who has no capacity to understand any of finer details.
>warmonger candidate wins with a female majority vote
>females occupying high-ranking decision making posts(Hannah Maliar, Kaja Kallas, Elvira Nabiullina, Ursula von Den Leyer)
>male population who never did anything is now preyed on by a gang of thugs(women happily work for the recruitment office, snitch on people, or even serve as bait like some of them did in Odessa)
>not my problem lol, it's just male on male violence, get drafted incel LOL
>*goes to europe to fuck Chad and spread AIDS*

By the way:
>But apparently, they were. In fact, between 1480 and 1913, Europe's queens were 27% more likely than its kings to wage war, according to a National Bureau of Economics working paper. And like Isabella, queens were also more likely to amass new territory during their reigns, found the paper's authors, economists Oeindrila Dube and S.P. Harish.