Search Results
7/20/2025, 8:28:18 PM
>>510903153
>ROMANIA. here's a QRD on The collapse of global liberalism by Philip Pilkington.
Thanks.
>Pilkington argues that the vision of a globalized, frictionless world driven by a tech-based service economy and governed by a rules-based liberal order was fundamentally flawed.
Yes but does he understand what the fundamental flaw is?
> He suggests that this vision has led to the creation of financialized economies and societies that are struggling to sustain themselves, both demographically and in terms of energy needs.
Sounds like he's yet another person who is noticing the symptoms and the effects but doesn't quite catch or grasp the actual cause.
>Pilkington contends that the United States and the United Kingdom, as key proponents of this liberal order, are now facing significant challenges in competing with countries like China, which operate under different political and economic paradigms.
No, China is operating under the same model, except with very heavy control and government and state interreference in the economy and in its steering also in a different part of the live cycle of the same model the rest of the world is operating on.
>He posits that the emerging global order prioritizes industrial capacity,
The need for industrial capacity never went away. You cannot have modern civilisation or technological advancement without an industrial base. It's just that the liberal west gutted and destroyed its industrial base in lieu of imports because liberalism is mental illness and how cargocultism manifests in high IQ races.
>realpolitik, and military strength over the liberal ideals that have dominated Western politics.
Won't happen under the current system (money, banks are legal, economy operates for financial profit). They'll choose collapse over this. Which is why the collapse has to and will come first. People are fucking married to their sacred cow of money, banking (legalised fraud) and capitalism (for-financial-profit operated society/economy).
>ROMANIA. here's a QRD on The collapse of global liberalism by Philip Pilkington.
Thanks.
>Pilkington argues that the vision of a globalized, frictionless world driven by a tech-based service economy and governed by a rules-based liberal order was fundamentally flawed.
Yes but does he understand what the fundamental flaw is?
> He suggests that this vision has led to the creation of financialized economies and societies that are struggling to sustain themselves, both demographically and in terms of energy needs.
Sounds like he's yet another person who is noticing the symptoms and the effects but doesn't quite catch or grasp the actual cause.
>Pilkington contends that the United States and the United Kingdom, as key proponents of this liberal order, are now facing significant challenges in competing with countries like China, which operate under different political and economic paradigms.
No, China is operating under the same model, except with very heavy control and government and state interreference in the economy and in its steering also in a different part of the live cycle of the same model the rest of the world is operating on.
>He posits that the emerging global order prioritizes industrial capacity,
The need for industrial capacity never went away. You cannot have modern civilisation or technological advancement without an industrial base. It's just that the liberal west gutted and destroyed its industrial base in lieu of imports because liberalism is mental illness and how cargocultism manifests in high IQ races.
>realpolitik, and military strength over the liberal ideals that have dominated Western politics.
Won't happen under the current system (money, banks are legal, economy operates for financial profit). They'll choose collapse over this. Which is why the collapse has to and will come first. People are fucking married to their sacred cow of money, banking (legalised fraud) and capitalism (for-financial-profit operated society/economy).
Page 1