>>714062848
If I'm to respect a woman as a person, then I should be able to respect their character. But I won't care about their past unless there are signs that they are untrustworthy. How they respond to stories of adultery with other people, how do they take confrontation, can they think through problems without defaulting to emotional reactivity. This is the kind of stuff dating is for, you should be able to properly gauge it within a few weeks or so without even needing to interrogate or anything. Just use your gut.
However, most men are poor at emotional sensitivity since society prioritizes training them for productive capacity. Awareness of this on the intuitive level along with justified fear of being blindsided by betrayal incentivizes simpler, more mechanical methods. How do they treat their past partners?
Of course, women do this too and can be just as emotionally retarded (just usually slightly higher) and this whole question is double standards ragebait tabloiod bullshit for low IQ min-wagers that use tiktok 8 hours a day

>>713559118
the tarantino crossover no one saw coming