>>24481450
>one catapult is bad
>archers are bad
>armies and battles of nothing but catapults and archers are the same thing

>>24481069
>they illustrate how men imbued with tradition (not LARPers like Evola) saw warfare

>these same men think mechanical warfare is unhonorable just like evola

youre just being any annoying redditor faggot contrarian looking to disagree with everything thats said without even fucking knowing what youre talking about which you already admitted.

these arent just opinions evola made and said everything should follow you nigger brained retard, its literally him studying history and Traditional society and pointing out what people and warriors in those societies thought about things such as rule and war. where do you think he got the idea that mechanical warefare is gay huh idiot? its not from his own war experience as you have pointed out. its from reading about war and what historical figures have said about it and looking for patterns.

btw you keep giving wrong examples (because again you have no fucking idea what youre talking and arguing about) and a king is the same thing as a knight-type warrior and to evola dont behave in the same way for reasons i already mentioned but you just ignored

crusaders, jihadists, samurai, whatever that indian warrior caste is are the examples he gives of the warrior type hes talking about where were all real historical things and no reason to bring up random wrong examples to """clap back""" or whatever the fuck you think youre doing


>>24481450
youre a retarded faggot as well

>nooo white men cant ever have had honor! only blacks and browns could have!

knights absolutely were not just common mercenary soldiers and did fight for higher ideas and have codes of conduct no matter how that makes reddit feel