>>16723807
If you draw an X on the side of a ball, you change the measurement of the ball by adding weight, literally blocks at the quantum plank level, to the ball.

But then if you moved the ball around an object in an orbit, but always kept the X pointed at the exact same direction it would have orbit, but not rotation/spin.

And if you removed the X, then the only way to measure it once again, to test if it was pointed in the same direction again, would be to add the weight back to the ball from the X marker once again.
So for all purposes, it could be spinning, but it is only detectable if it is spinning by "marking it" or, observing it, measuring it.
Thusly changing it, and then perhaps causing the measurement that we are looking for.

https://youtu.be/3_s_FKy2FFs?si=jsSrMLhnl3KEUZLw

Yall do realize that 60 FPS means 60 images displayed into your eyeball in a singular second?
Some people play at 120, and higher.
StarChildren from the dawning of the age of Aquarius, we see things the boomers cant....frames of time....much closer to the Plank length....but the boomers would be content with 14,4k dialup, 1 single tab open on one device....per day to check the weather sports and ideological slop slurp.