>>713236116
>So loyalty over qualifications, congrats you're a shill for nepotism and the rest of your post can be disregarded.
That's the nature of politics. It's like saying I'm irredeemable for claiming everyone will die eventually. What was it that you said...
>You're chasing after some idealized system
There we go.

>And that's all that matters
No it doesn't, and the fact that you ostensibly believe that sincerely means you're, hmm, how do I phrase this...
>extremely naive, or a shill.
Yeah, that.

>Except it's not
...Okay, now I think you're just being a contrarian.

>Nepotism doesn't mean competency
What? Competency is a necessary component of an elite maintaining power. If they become incompetent, they get replaced in relatively short order.

>want to keep this corrupt system
Oh no, I want to reform the system, it's just that it would be in a direction you would apparently be opposed to, Marxoid trash.

And yeah, I know you're just baiting by now based on that post, but I said I would take it at face value.