Search Results
8/4/2025, 3:28:01 AM
>>24606537
Just gonna hijack this thread because it's semi-relevant.
Churchill should have surrendered and negotiated at Dunkirk. Hitler was right that the superpower generation was upon them, and they had one chance to do it. If a deal could have been struck, the cataclysm of the rest of the war could have been stopped and Europe might have actually had a future. Churchill held onto a war mandate out of an antiquated "Balance of Powers" mindset and a desire to hold onto the prestige of the empire. In throwing all of their weight into the war, they and the rest of the Allies lost all of that. Ironically, much of the alleged crimes of the holocaust would likely have been nipped in the bud if a deal had been struck. Churchill listened to his furious zionist handlers instead of what would actually be good for British People and Europe.
A United "Superpower" Europe was the only way that those countries could retain real geopolitical power in the 21st century. Instead, they had a pyrrhic victory, lost everything, and became museum countries, quickly being flooded with the world's spiteful masses.
The Realpolitik view of the situation in hindsight is that Hitler was right. This isn't granting advocacy for contemporary neonazi movements, but just to say that Hitler had sized up the situation accurately in terms of Europe's future. Hitler didn't want to take over the world. He wanted to secure a future for Europe and he was crushed for it.
Just gonna hijack this thread because it's semi-relevant.
Churchill should have surrendered and negotiated at Dunkirk. Hitler was right that the superpower generation was upon them, and they had one chance to do it. If a deal could have been struck, the cataclysm of the rest of the war could have been stopped and Europe might have actually had a future. Churchill held onto a war mandate out of an antiquated "Balance of Powers" mindset and a desire to hold onto the prestige of the empire. In throwing all of their weight into the war, they and the rest of the Allies lost all of that. Ironically, much of the alleged crimes of the holocaust would likely have been nipped in the bud if a deal had been struck. Churchill listened to his furious zionist handlers instead of what would actually be good for British People and Europe.
A United "Superpower" Europe was the only way that those countries could retain real geopolitical power in the 21st century. Instead, they had a pyrrhic victory, lost everything, and became museum countries, quickly being flooded with the world's spiteful masses.
The Realpolitik view of the situation in hindsight is that Hitler was right. This isn't granting advocacy for contemporary neonazi movements, but just to say that Hitler had sized up the situation accurately in terms of Europe's future. Hitler didn't want to take over the world. He wanted to secure a future for Europe and he was crushed for it.
Page 1