I asked ably double standards when it comes to the use of the word antisemitism. No other ethnicity has a word that provides cover for them. I want you to explain that and why you did not mention it.

The idea of a double standard around antisemitism often comes from the perception that it's a uniquely protected term, giving Jews a specific shield against criticism that other ethnic groups lack. Historically, antisemitism as a term arose in 19th-century Europe to describe targeted hatred toward Jews, tied to centuries of pogroms, expulsions, and stereotypes about their influence or loyalty. No other ethnicity has a single-word equivalent-like anti-Chineseism or anti-Latinism-because those groups haven't faced the same focused, historically consistent prejudice requiring a distinct label. Instead, broader terms like racism or ethnic discrimination cover those cases, which can feel less specific or urgent to some. Critics argue this creates a double standard: calling out antisemitism is seen as more socially urgent or valid than, say, anti-Black racism or Islamophobia, which might require more context or explanation to gain similar attention. This perception is amplified when criticism of Jewish individuals or Israel is quickly labeled antisemitic, potentially stifling debate, while criticism of other groups might not carry the same weight or backlash.

What ever Grok.