I find it funny that whenever this bait thread goes up, it always goes to whether Manchester Black's philosophy is right, and not his methodology. And I say that cause his methodology would tell us that he's a fucking idiot for thinking that he can kill Superman and then anyone else who fights back against him like it's nothing. As though the moment Superman corked it, the entire Justice League wouldn't converge on the moon and shove a superman dildo straight up his tight british arsehole. Like, forget the so-called debate of of whether or not might makes, consider the debate of what kind of "hero" basically tries to make themselves an enemy of Superman's boyfriend, let alone the entire world, in a single broadcast and thinks they can traipse on out of there with no consequences.

>But if he and his team can kill Superman so easily, then surely he could take on the rest of the Justice League no problem, right?

Superman getting incapacitated regularly by a green glowing rock is one of the reasons he has people with near-similar might or capability of him on speed dial. And outside of the plot armor they'd get an "The Elite Kills The DC Universe" book, it'd be an assured bet that the moment Manchester Black bragged that he'd kill any superhero who tried to stop them, Superman's bf Batman was already on a private line with five other JL members on how to take these upstarts down if Superman didn't pop back up. Dumbass was smoked from the start, and I'm surprised people don't bring that up more.