>>40164617
>half the page is the text, the other half is (I shit you not) the footnote
Hah, yeah, I've seen that before. Not in that book, I can't recall where. I personally just don't read footnotes tbqh
>quantifiers and algebraic notation would have made his word vomit much more concise
Hmm, in my experience, philosophy people prefer the written word. Many are not interested in nor good at math. They tend to be verbal thinkers. I guess there's the whole analytical philosophy thing... maybe you'd enjoy that... oh, and Spinoza...
I mean, from what little I've read, I don't remember Kant being a bad writer, just a really difficult one. Now Hegel...
>I've asked before at the kinda people you met at your unis, right?
Not sure... I guess I had some okay fellow students the first time I went to uni. It was a pleasant and cultured environment. Maybe it was because it was a humanities course. I managed to fall in with the wrong crowd outside of my degree though (Burschis)
>Someone you can just ask if they are mad at you, or judge you, or if you are a burden
Yeah, I'm not going to find someone like that where I am.
>intrusive thoughts and anxieties which I can only combat through letting myself be reassured
I get those sometimes too. I used to get them a lot more, but I've learned to handle them on my own to some degree (meditation routine)
>the deal you are currently envisioning is the kind of thing that people can do in their 20s
You know, I think I'll cross that bridge when I get to it.
>I am not as much a career person as I thought I was. That is a very people person thing to say.
I am not a people person by any stretch...
>If someone tells you of something with that sparkle in their eyes. You just wanna be part of it even if it's not your subject.
I can't really relate here, anon. I've met very few people who were ever passionate about something other than making a lot of money, being successful and living the normie life. Even at uni, they were the minority...